A short satire I wrote because I wanted to stop thinking about it.
Glaucon: Ah friends, we have debated fruitfully. We should send Alcibiades to bring us some food before we head to the theatre. What do you think you want?
Alcibiades: I feel like a sandwich, I know a place.
Glaucon: A sandwich sounds splendid.
Socrates: I agree as well, I definitely felt like having a burrito.
Glaucon: You say you agree, but you want a burrito. Do you jest, Socrates?
Socrates: You said sandwiches, I simply named one I felt like having.Glaucon: A burrito is not a sandwich, my old friend. Your age must be distorting your judgment.
Socrates: Forgive me, maybe I am simply mistaken about what sandwiches are. You are the authority, if you claim with such certainty to know that a burrito is not a sandwich. Can you then answer me a simple question, what is a sandwich?
Alcibiades: Oh no, not again. Please let’s not do this.
Glaucon: It’s alright Alcibiades, this is a simple matter between friends. A sandwich would be two slices of bread with various meats, vegetables, and spreads in between. The bread sandwiches the other ingredients, and thus the term. So, you see my friends, a burrito cannot be a sandwich.
Socrates: That is very interesting, indeed. But a burrito also contains various meats, vegetables, and spreads. Do you agree that those things are therefore not essential to what you call a sandwich?
Glaucon: Indeed, it appears so.
Socrates: So, it is the two slices of bread that are then necessary?
Glaucon: Aye, so I think.
Socrates: And if it must be two slices, then one would be too few, and three too many?
Glaucon: Indeed it is so.
Socrates: What then of the famous club sandwich, you must agree that it is a sandwich?
Glaucon: I do not see why it would not be the case.
Socrates: But the club sandwich has three slices, so you see, your own words testify against you.
Glaucon: In that case let me correct: a sandwich must be two or three slices of bread. Two of which must be the outer layers of the sandwich.
Socrates: Ah, what then of the Norwegian smørrebrød? That is only one slice of bread, but it is nonetheless a sandwich.
Glaucon: That is indeed a sandwich, I admit. But it is a special kind, which we call the “open faced sandwich” – if that is what we meant, then we would have specified. A standard sandwich must have two slices, for the term sandwich refers to the verb. As in, “sandwiched between two slices of bread.”
Socrates: Very well, I will grant you then, that there are sandwiches and there are open-faced sandwiches. But if that is the case, then you must mean that the sandwiching of the ingredients between the two slices of bread is the crucial element of a sandwich?
Glaucon: Yes, this is what I meant all along. Indeed.
Socrates: What then of the Vietnamese bánh mì? Is that not a sandwich?
Glaucon: It is, aye.
Socrates: A báhn mì is made using a bread roll, in other words, one bit of bread, that is sliced into. If a sandwich must have two slices or more, surely then, it is not a sandwich.
Glaucon: You are correct. Perhaps I should clarify then, that the key is that the bread sandwiches, that is, holds together the ingredients.
Socrates: Very well, you are changing what you have said, but I will forgive you because we are friends. And tell me, what is the shape of a burrito?
Glaucon: You must think me foolish if you ask. It is tubular.
Socrates: And what is it made of?
Glaucon: A tortilla and fillings. But pray tell, where are you going with this Socrates? I am hungry, and I am prone to being hangry in this state.
Socrates: I promise dear friend that I will show you, just bear with me one more moment. Now just tell me, what is a tortilla?
Glaucon: A kind of bread, made flat out of corn or wheat.
Socrates: And finally, in a burrito, does this bread cover the fillings on all sides?
Socrates: And in the tubular shape of the burrito, does the tortilla not cover the fillings completely?
Glaucon: I suppose it does.
Socrates: Then, by your own argument, does the bread not sandwich the ingredients from every possible point?
Glaucon: I suppose it does.
Socrates: Then you will finally admit that a burrito is a sandwich?
Glaucon: You have yet again tricked me into admitting something I do not think. Yes, by the way you explain it, the burrito must be a sandwich. And my hunger now prevents me from thinking clearly. Have it your way.
Socrates: Very well then, we shall have burritos.
Alcibiades: This is all very well Socrates, but we tire of your games. You know well what we meant. And besides, a burrito is a wrap, and not a sandwich. It is its own category which shares some features with a sandwich, but it is in itself not a sandwich.
Socrates: My dear boy, I always knew you were not just a pretty face, but an astute mind as well. Correct my error then and explain please wherein lies the difference.
Alcibiades: It is simple. The wrap covers the fillings completely, whereas the sandwich does not.
Socrates: Very well. And tell me then, if you consider a shawarma a wrap?
Alcibiades: I don’t know where you are going with this, but yes, I do.
Socrates: But the shawarma is not wrapped the way a burrito is, the ends are open. It is therefore not a wrap by your own words.
Alcibiades: You twist my words like you did Glaucon’s. But that is true.
Socrates: And the shawarma, like the burrito, consists in a flatbread which sandwiches the fillings on all sides, does it not?
Alcibiades: I suppose.
Socrates: You see then, my friends, a wrap, by your own definitions, is just a sandwich.
Glaucon: I swear to all of the Gods Socrates, you know well what we meant.
Alcibiades: I concur with Glaucon, you are merely playing games for your own amusement at our cost, and now we are running out of time to eat.
Socrates: Forgive me friends, I was merely attempting to clarify what you were saying with such certainty. I’m an old man, and it is hard for me to avoid my habits. Perhaps we should choose a different food to avoid the confusion in our minds and make our hunger simpler?
Glaucon: I suppose, we could have calzone then, the Etruscan by the forum is a master of his craft, and we can carry them with us to the theatre.
Socrates: I thought we said ‘no’ to sandwiches?